Turkish Neurosurgery 2025 , Vol 35 , Num 3
General Neurosurgery and Miscellaneous-Others - Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1
Guilherme Lucas de OLIVEIRA LIMA1,Marlon Cesar SOUZA-FILHO1,Luiz Gonzaga de OLIVEIRA-JUNIOR1,Daniel Felipe Fernandes PAIVA3,Roger Schmidt BROCK2,Eberval Gadelha FIGUEIREDO2
1Nervous System Unit - Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Onofre Lopes University Hospital, Natal, Brazil
2University of São Paulo, Departament of Neurology, São Paulo, Brazil
3Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Departament of Bioscience, Piracicaba, Brazil
DOI : 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47107-24.2 AIM: To validate the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) as a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tool and identify the cutoffs of CCOS-PROM and EuroQoL-5D-3L score index (EQ-SI) against Gestalt in adults who underwent chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) treatment.

MATERIAL and METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed the health status of CM1 adults after a 12-month surgery follow-up. An electronic form was sent to groups of CM patients. The self-Gestalt good perception was distributed as a cure or improvement for validation purposes. AUROC was evaluated to verify the ability of each PROM to predict Gestalt outcomes. Ethical approval registry: 64148822.0.0000.5292.

RESULTS: The 85 subjects had a mean age of 42.1(±10.6) years and a follow-up of 4.8(±4.1) years. Gestalt outcome was good for 23(27%) patients. The median CCOS-PROM of 74 patients was 11(IQR 4). The median EQ-SI of 84 patients was 0.52(IQR 0.29). CCOS-PROM score of 13 was the optimal cutoff value (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 78.4%). For EQ-SI, this value was 0.64 (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 75.4%). The AUROC for CCOS-PROM and EQ-SI were 0.90 and 0.86, respectively.

CONCLUSION: CCOS-PROM is valid for assessing the outcome of CM1 surgery in adults. CCOS-PROM score of 13 and EQ-SI of 0.64 were the best tradeoff values. Keywords : Arnold-Chiari malformation, Treatment outcome, Cauda equina, Posterior cranial fossa, Surveys and questionnaires

Corresponding author : Guilherme Lucas de OLIVEIRA LIMA, guilhermelimaneurocirurgia@gmail.com