MATERIAL and METHODS: The results of 84 patients with cervical radicular pain who underwent combined DRG-PRF and TAESI under fluoroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. Primer outcome is the pain measurements of the patients before and after the procedure at the 1^st, 3^rd, and 6^th months were evaluated with the Verbal Pain Scale (VPS). Our secondary outcome was the evaluation of patient satisfaction in the 1^st, 3^rd, and 6^th months after the interventional treatment, and it was considered significant if it was evaluated as ?good? above 50%.

RESULTS: We found statistically significant decrease in the pain scores of the patients in the 1^st, 3^rd, and 6^th months compared to the pre-intervention (VPS 0) (p<0.001). After the procedure, the patients expressed their satisfaction level as 69.1% at the 1^st month, 71.5% at the 3^rd month, and 72.6% at the 6th month as ?very good/good?. While the operation was mostly performed at the C5-6 level on both sides, it was seen that 61.9% of the operations were applied from the right side and 38.1% from the left side. No adverse effects or fatal neurological complications were observed.

CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy and complications of cervical TAESI and DRG-PRF treatment are controversial in the literature, we think that this combined treatment can provide effective pain palliation in experienced hands with appropriate patient selection, considering the risk / benefit ratio. Keywords : Radicular pain, Chronic pain, Pulse radiofrequency, Cervical epidural injection, Dorsal root ganglion